Sadly, if you are not using Internet Explorer, this page looks like crapola. Sorry about that. I am a weblogger, not a webdeveloper.

This site will look much better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.

all the misterben news you can shake a stick at

all he needs is a bunch of cameras around his neck and some bermuda shorts on the chair - first thing in the morning more fun than you can handle grandma gives ben a ride rolling down the highway and waving at the cars ben and his odd new friend ben tries to ride a tricycle while mom tries to bury the buddha a closeup of the buddha making the rounds in my moms crazy garden getting ready to create a masterpiece

permanent pictures

This is one of my favorite pictures of Ben.  He is not unplugging the VCR or throwing up.  What an angel. Lorrie in Lake Superior Provincial Park.  My sweetheart. My dad.  I may be insane, but it is through no fault of my own.  It is purely genetics. My mom.  She was giving me static about not having a picture of her on the web.  This'll teach her. My Mom and Dad - after a lifetime of embarassing me as a kid, it's payback time. The Lensers (Shaney, Amy, Lenny, Niecy) - One of the nicest families around.  They are our surrogate family here in Ottawa.

insightful comments

June 3, 2002

I have no scientific proof to support or refute what I am about to say. I am simply postulating. You can give me your two cents if you would like.

Look at the graph on the left. I drew this while sitting in a chair when I was away at the cottage. I was thinking about children and education. I was thinking about how short childhood is. I was thinking about how nice it would be to be a kid with little worries and little cares. I was imagining having nothing but time to sit and enjoy learning new things around me without any pressure to succeed or any fear of failure. I was thinking that learning for the sheer enjoyment of learning would be nice.

I started thinking about intelligence and when it starts to bud in kids. I would guess that the period from birth to puberty is the period in which most of the intellectual leaps and bounds take place. After that, the personality is firmly rooted, most of the hardwiring is done, and the human being simply refines this for the remainder of their life.

Consider the cyan (light blue) line on the graph. This is my representation of the average development of intelligence with age. There is a sharp increase from birth until 12 years or so, then there is a quick, albeit lesser increase from 12 until 25-30 when most education and job training takes place. After that intelligence does not rise all that rapidly for the remainder of the lifespan. Seems reasonable.

Now consider the dark blue line. It follows essentially the same pattern, but at a higher level. This is my representation of the gifted individual. That person who is born with their wiring set up a little more efficiently. Patterns are clearer, understanding comes easier, learning comes quicker. There are some people like that out there. The problem I find with a lot of parents is that they all think that their kids fit into the gifted category. More often than not, they are probably wrong.

And then there is the third category represented by the red line. I am calling this the "accelerated" kid. I am not talking about the kid who does his homework and gets acceptable grades while maintaining a social life and an enjoyment of the process of learning. I am talking about the kid that gets outside tutoring to improve their already acceptable grades. This is the kid that the parents want to turn into a gifted kid. This is the kid that is pushed hard to learn, fast tracked through school and bombarded with as much "educational" time as possible to ensure that they accelerate past their peers.

I often wonder about these kids. My wonder is represented by the red line. I wonder if pushing your kid early does indeed give them a slightly better intelligence when compared to their young friends, but this difference then becomes negligible or non-existent once they reach early adulthood. If my red line is accurate, it is quite possible that all of the pushing and prodding and driving of children to perform at a higher level actually does not do them any good later in life. If anything, it could do damage to their enjoyment of living.

As a kid I was not pushed to learn. My parents knew I had potential but told me that as long as I did my best, that was good enough for them. In highschool, I didn't try that hard, but got away with acceptable grades. When I did not hand in a report or failed an exam, I learned that it was my own fault. Somewhere along the way, I realized that my best was something that I had discovered for my self. I realized that with some hard work, I could accomplish many things. In the end, I feel happy with where my intelligence level has developed to. If my parents had pushed me harder, would I have ended up happier/richer/more successful than I am now? Or would I have developed a distaste for learning and yet still ended up as intelligent as I am now. It is a tough call.

::Also showcased at Raising Hell::
5:14 PM - Comments [2]

May 31, 2002

While I am gone, entertain yourself with the penny. Who would have thought that pennies were so interesting? If pennies aren't your thing, what about dots? Or numbers? Or simply compare how big things are. It is incredible the stuff you can come up with when you are contemplating being away from your computer for 48 hours.
12:49 PM - Comments [0]
I will not be here this weekend. This page will not be updated. Please refer to the remainder of the internet for entertaining commentary. Thank you for your understanding.
11:47 AM - Comments [0]

May 30, 2002

It's no secret. We are a few small steps away from the big leap. I don't know how long this link will last. Here is an extra snapshot in the even the other link goes dead. What do you think?
9:39 AM - Comments [10]

May 28, 2002

I have come up with a revolutionary idea for the movie making industry. This is something that Hollywood would probably pay millions of dollars for. But I am going to give it away for free. It is the use of computer animation in movies. Of course, that has been done. And it had been done well. But there is an application of computer graphics in major motion pictures that has been missed for years. And it's time has finally come.


If there is something I hate, it is when a character leans over to hurl and all that comes out is a mouthful. It is obvious that the volume of vomit is exactly the amount that the actor could hold in their mouth when the director yells "Action!". And it bugs me every time. Whenever I have hurled (tequila induced purging in Algonquin park, Halloween party vomit in a grocery bag, every flu I can remember, etc) the volume that comes up is incredible. It is definitely more than a mouthful. So, with major motion pictures having astronomical budgets, why can't a little money be funnelled into making the vomit look realistic? I think that this is something that would be well worth the money. I can imagine myself leaving a movie saying "That movie kinda sucked, but boy did that guy HURL!".

There you go, Hollywood. Do your thing...
8:00 PM - Comments [3]
Did you remove mt-load.cgi when you installed Movable Type? I sure hope so.
7:35 AM - Comments [2]